Overall

WILL BPA OFFICIALS FACE CHARGES?

In the CAA-BPA Exposition, revised several times since 1996, BPA Ltd trading as British Skydiving makes the extraordinary and false claim that contravention of the British Skydiving Operations Manual is a breach of legal requirements.

However, a recently disclosed professional 49-page report exposes BPA Ltd malpractice and lawbreaking over several decades. You can request a copy of this report by clicking on this link, as well as a copy of the CAA-BPA Exposition.

Should BPA Ltd directors and members of the BPA Ltd Council of Governors past and present who served as fronts for the firm's ghost directorate be seeking legal advice about statutes of limitations relating to this lawbreaking?

BPA Ltd offences include wilful evasion of Health and Safety Executive scrutiny and regulation, as the following extract from the report's conclusions shows.







 


at No comments:
Subscribe to: Posts (Atom)

HSE EXEMPTS BPA FROM H&S LAW?

BPA exempted from the Health and Safety at Work etc Act 1974? Are HSE Memoranda of Understanding a legal paradox or simp...

  • RACHEL FISK: WHITEWASH?
      RACHEL FISK: WHITEWASH? By Mike Bravo CMIOSH Any reputable company or organisation will have in place established sui...
  • BPA TRESPASSING ON MOD TERRITORY?
    JUST ANOTHER SKYDIVING DEATH?   Part 1 of 3 by Bravo Three Zero CMIOSH   Following the recent skydiving death on 3.9.20...
  • BPA PROTECTION RACKET?
    BPA PROTECTION RACKET? By Don Canard On its website, British Parachute Association Ltd trading as British Skydiving states that it “...